← Search

Michelle Dayco

— year-end
34 matches · 21W–13L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Michelle Dayco to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history34 matches
L
2026-06-14 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 18AW4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Andrew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-08 · MONTE VISTA HS 18AW3.5A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Winnie Rock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-07 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 18AW4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nanny Tunnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-06 · MONTE VISTA HS 18AW3.5A · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · MONTE VISTA HS 18AW3.5A · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-05-17 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 18AW4.0A · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-05-16 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 18AW4.0A · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-14 · MONTE VISTA HS 18AW3.5A · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-11 · MONTE VISTA HS 18AW3.5A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Winnie Rock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-10 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 18AW4.0A · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-04-25 · MONTE VISTA HS 18AW3.5A · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · MONTE VISTA HS 18AW3.5A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline D Sherbourne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
100%
8W–0L · 57.3% of games
4.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 43.3% of games
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 55.4% of games
8.0mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 46.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
8 matches
#1 Singles
18%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
4 matches
#2 Singles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal