← Search

Tipu Qureshi

Bothell, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
78 matches · 48W–30L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tipu Qureshi to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history78 matches
L
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Jeffrey Ng championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-14 · #3 Doubles · with Jeffrey Ng championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-07 · MC-Wolf Pack v2-Hinojosa · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Ng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-31 · MC-Wolf Pack v2-Hinojosa · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Chung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-30 · MC-Ready Squad-Seet · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Wajerski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-23 · MC-Ready Squad-Seet · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-17 · MC-Ready Squad-Seet · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-09 · MC-Wolf Pack v2-Hinojosa · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Ng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · MC-Wolf Pack v2-Hinojosa · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-26 · MC-Wolf Pack v2-Hinojosa · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Ng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-04-26 · MC-Ready Squad-Seet · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Ng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-17 · MC-Wolf Pack v2-Hinojosa · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
100%
10W–0L · 67.6% of games
3.5
63.2%
24W–14L · 57.5% of games
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 30.2% of games
3.5mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 65.5% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 61.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
21 matches
#1 Singles
26%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
12 matches
#2 Singles
12%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
8 matches
#1 Male Singles
6%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe