← Search

Lisa LoJacono

Denver, CO
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
103 matches · 50W–53L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lisa LoJacono to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history103 matches
W
2026-09-02 · EM BLACK · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Anne Kay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-08-12 · EM BLACK · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sarah Nottingham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-11 · EM BLACK · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jacqueline Lindley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-29 · EM BLACK · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Anne Kay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-22 · EM PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Dana Pluss Parks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-14 · EM PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Cynthia Mejia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3
W
2026-07-08 · EM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sarah Nottingham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-07-01 · EM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jacqueline Lindley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-30 · EM PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Judith Andrews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-24 · EM BLUE · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-26 · EM PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Mandi Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-20 · EM PURPLE · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
63.1%
41W–24L · 56% of games
3.0
10.5%
2W–17L · 37.8% of games
5.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 35.3% of games
6.0mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
13 matches
#1 Singles
8%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal