← Search

Allison Bloch

Princeton, NJ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
450 matches · 293W–157L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Allison Bloch to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history450 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Bring It On!!! · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mitch Kleiman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Yoojung Co championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-05 · NJD/Straight Sets · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison North
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-1
W
2026-08-02 · #2 Doubles · with Penni Sander championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Egle Jokubauskyte championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
MaryEllen Granozio / Katie Johnson
2026-07-30 · NJD/Straight Sets · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison North
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Arvind Upadhyay mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-12 · Bring It On!!! · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ajay Singhal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
Katie Conrad / Kimberly Wong
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Wu Yang championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-05 · Pennsbury Peacocks · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Roslyn Yang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-06-03 · MSU:Doubles and Bubbles · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Samantha Mulcahy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-06-02 · Fine Whines · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susanna Smit
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams72 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
69.6%
16W–7L · 58.5% of games
3.5
71.7%
162W–64L · 61.1% of games
4.0
51.2%
22W–21L · 50.9% of games
7.0mixed
66.2%
43W–22L · 56.2% of games
7.5mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 52.6% of games
8.0mixed
57.7%
15W–11L · 53.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
172 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
160 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
111 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
5 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert