← Search

Kate Trask

Leesburg, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
258 matches · 121W–137L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kate Trask to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history258 matches
L
2026-08-30 · IL - Ruther's Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Betsy Payne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-29 · IL - Ruther's Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alicia Martini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-16 · IL - Ruther's Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne McMullen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-01 · IL - Ruther's Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alicia Martini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-18 · IL - Kemon - All About That Ace · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tara Jefferson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-28 · IL - Kemon - All About That Ace · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Freda Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-20 · IL - Kemon - All About That Ace · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janet Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-4
W
2026-06-17 · Team 11 Loosely Strung · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandy Lucidi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
N/A
2026-06-13 · IL - Kemon - All About That Ace · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-12 · Team 11 Loosely Strung · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim McCool
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-02 · Team 11 Loosely Strung · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura McNicholl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-31 · Team 4 Loosely Strung · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
68.2%
15W–7L · 59.2% of games
3.0
44%
81W–103L · 46.2% of games
3.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 38.7% of games
5.5
52.9%
9W–8L · 53.4% of games
6.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 49.6% of games
6.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 49.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
104 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
78 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
59 matches
#1 Singles
4%
9 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#3 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal