← Search

Carla Ferrara

Cherry Hill, NJ
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
134 matches · 28W–106L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Carla Ferrara to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history134 matches
L
2026-08-17 · Racquet Rebels · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Abby Cohler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-03 · Racquet Rebels · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsey Fratz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
Michelle Cuff / Michele Seher
2026-07-13 · Racquet Rebels · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Robbins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-12 · Boro Blasters · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Siobhan Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-3
W
2026-06-28 · Boro Blasters · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Siobhan Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-13 · Racquet Scientists · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deborah Downs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-31 · Boro Blasters · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Siobhan Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-05-27 · 40 Love · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Siobhan Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-20 · 40 Love · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Donela Weber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-17 · Racquet Scientists · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Siobhan Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-17 · Boro Blasters · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janet Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-16 · Racquet Scientists · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Siobhan Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
2.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 62.3% of games
3.0
18.3%
17W–76L · 34.9% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
5.9%
1W–16L · 28.6% of games
6.5mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 39.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
58 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
33 matches
#2 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer