← Search

Laura Slowikowski

— year-end
185 matches · 105W–80L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Laura Slowikowski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history185 matches
W
Beth Pychinka / Laurie Schneider
2026-09-10 · Low Tri W IRCD Andersen · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Megan Talpas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-03 · Low Tri W IRCD Andersen · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Mallory Inselberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-1
L
2026-08-27 · Low Tri W IRCD Andersen · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kelle Hennessee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-20 · Low Tri W IRCD Andersen · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Megan Talpas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-14 · Indy X18 7.0X CRC Kim · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joshua McShane mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-24 · Indy X18 7.0X CRC Kim · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with SC Bocade mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-20 · Indy A40 3.5W IRCD Lieber-Hale · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
Trudy Coler
2026-07-16 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Inselberg · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-09 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Inselberg · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-08 · Indy A40 3.5W IRCD Lieber-Hale · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-06 · Indy A40 3.5W IRCD Lieber-Hale · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-07-01 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Inselberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Chlystun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Teams17 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 55.7% of games
3.5
58.6%
41W–29L · 53.1% of games
4.0
53.8%
7W–6L · 51.9% of games
6.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 51.1% of games
7.5
48.1%
13W–14L · 50.5% of games
6.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 45.8% of games
6.5mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 51.6% of games
7.0mixed
60.6%
20W–13L · 55% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
64 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
56 matches
#1 Singles
17%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
28 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal