← Search

Colleen Hansen

Pocatello, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
158 matches · 46W–112L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Colleen Hansen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history158 matches
L
2026-08-06 · Middle Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Tapanila
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Carrie Rose Lindley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-31 · #3 Doubles · with Lori Tapanila championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-28 · Middle Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Breanna Aldrich / Tina Taylor
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · with Lori Tapanila championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Victoria Scharp championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-17 · #2 Doubles · with Victoria Scharp championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-17 · #3 Doubles · with Victoria Scharp championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-14 · Middle Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Tapanila
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-30 · Middle Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Venita Petti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-26 · We Still Got IT · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paige Sheffield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-24 · Players · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Tapanila
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
30.8%
4W–9L · 42.5% of games
3.0
41.7%
20W–28L · 44.3% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 50.8% of games
7.0
0%
0W–4L · 26.9% of games
5.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
21.2%
11W–41L · 37.8% of games
6.5mixed
18.8%
3W–13L · 43.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
54 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
41 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert