← Search

Eric Lindburg

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
205 matches · 91W–114L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Eric Lindburg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history205 matches
L
2026-08-02 · TCSP-Tennis Classics Still Playing-Curtis · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hwayun Lee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-31 · TCSP-Macduff · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sara Addicott mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-07-25 · TCSP-Macduff · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sara Addicott mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-24 · TCSP-Love All-Cullop · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with J Coifman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-18 · TCSP-Tennis Classics Still Playing-Curtis · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Zimbelman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-11 · TCSP-Macduff · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robin Freedman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-28 · TCSP-Love All-Cullop · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jan Stroh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-28 · TCSP-Macduff · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Vanderburg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-20 · TCSP-Tennis Classics Still Playing-Curtis · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Molly Bullard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-12 · TCSP-Love All-Cullop · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Grant mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-05 · TCSP-Sandbaggers-Kelley · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alan Draper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · TCSP-Sandbaggers-Kelley · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alan Draper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
56.7%
17W–13L · 51.8% of games
4.0
34.3%
12W–23L · 46.3% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
57.1%
12W–9L · 55.1% of games
8.0
52.6%
10W–9L · 52.6% of games
7.0mixed
37.5%
15W–25L · 46.4% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
13W–26L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
74 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
57 matches
#1 Male Doubles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe