← Search

Dena Niksich

Cumming, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
76 matches · 41W–35L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Dena Niksich to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history76 matches
L
2026-08-08 · Team Brady (CONFIRMED)* · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Dimenna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-8
L
2026-08-08 · Team Brady (CONFIRMED)* · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brooke Billingsley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-8
L
2026-07-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracy Saracki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with April Hoffmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with April Hoffmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-04 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Bosker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-28 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Faust
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-11-20 · Fieldstone (Denise Faust)* · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Bosker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 6-0
L
2025-11-18 · Fieldstone (Micaela Brady)* · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Micaela Brady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-13 · Fieldstone (Denise Faust)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Faust
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-09 · Fieldstone (Denise Faust)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Bosker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2025-07-15 · Fieldstone (Micaela Brady)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Micaela Brady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
60%
3W–2L · 57% of games
3.5
62.7%
32W–19L · 55.9% of games
4.0
33.3%
6W–12L · 42.9% of games
6.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
13%
10 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe