← Search

Katya Salkever

— year-end
18 matches · 8W–10L · seasons 2019–2023

Captains: add Katya Salkever to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history18 matches
L
2023-06-27 · DED:Dedham:Guermazi/Schramm · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mariela Zirlinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2023-05-16 · DED:Dedham:Guermazi/Schramm · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Noura Guermazi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2022-06-09 · DED:Dedham Athletic:Schramm/Guermazi · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mariela Zirlinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2022-06-07 · BWEL:BSC Wellesley:Evans/Wolf · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daphne Rayment
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2022-06-02 · DED:Dedham Athletic:Schramm/Guermazi · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Karen Schramm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2021-07-07 · WTC:Sense-ace-tional ladies:Leveille/Crabtree · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Wilks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-5
W
2021-06-16 · WTC:Sense-ace-tional ladies:Leveille/Crabtree · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Wilks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2019-07-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lyn Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2019-07-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marina Momot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2019-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Caitlin Blasco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2019-07-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caitlin Blasco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
Maria Argiriadi / Ana Fill
2019-06-26 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caitlin Blasco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Teams4 teams · 2021–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
60%
6W–4L · 62.2% of games
4.5
25%
2W–6L · 35.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova