← Search

Lawrence Jinks

MATTHEWS, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
223 matches · 127W–96L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Lawrence Jinks to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history223 matches
W
2026-09-07 · THodge (Blakeney) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michael van Bergen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-09-03 · MUtyesonich (Blakeney) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Messay Abebe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-31 · THodge (Blakeney) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Timothy Hodge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-27 · MUtyesonich (Blakeney) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Messay Abebe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-22 · BHarrell/NLeCroy (WSRC) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bradley Holcman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-20 · MUtyesonich (Blakeney) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kartik Mahalingam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-17 · THodge (Blakeney) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Manojkumar Panachikal Madhavan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-13 · MUtyesonich (Blakeney) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kartik Mahalingam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-08-10 · THodge (Blakeney) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jamie ORourke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-07-30 · MWright (Blakeney) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Wright mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-23 · MWright (Blakeney) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Wright mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · BHarrell/NLeCroy (WSRC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patrick Murchison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
40%
2W–3L · 48.8% of games
4.0
64.1%
75W–42L · 57% of games
4.5
31.2%
5W–11L · 39.4% of games
7.5
66.7%
12W–6L · 57.8% of games
8.5
48.5%
16W–17L · 49.2% of games
4.0mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 51.2% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 31% of the time
#3 Doubles
31%
69 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
67 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
62 matches
#2 Singles
5%
10 matches
#1 Singles
4%
9 matches
#3 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams