← Search

Amanda Tucker

Atlanta, GA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
16 matches · 7W–9L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amanda Tucker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history16 matches
L
2026-01-15 · Capital City Club (Jessi Rosenbaum)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalie Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-08 · Capital City Club (Jessi Rosenbaum)* · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalie Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
Mary Johnson / Cherie Peyton
2025-12-11 · Capital City Club (Jessi Rosenbaum)* · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalie Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2025-11-20 · Capital City Club (Jessi Rosenbaum)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Moseley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-10 · Capital City (Lauren Middour)* · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2025-01-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adrianne Meyers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2024-11-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carrie Whitney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 6-1
L
2024-01-11 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2024-01-04 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 7-6
W
2023-12-14 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2023-06-29 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2023-05-22 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
46.7%
7W–8L · 49% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 25% of the time
#2 Doubles
25%
4 matches
#2 Singles
25%
4 matches
#1 Singles
19%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer