← Search

Jean Landmesser

Canton, GA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
84 matches · 53W–31L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Jean Landmesser to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
L
2026-06-30 · Bridgemill - Spohner · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elaine Eternod
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
Linda Johnson / Miriam Gibson
2026-06-25 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nina Hutcherson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-18 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-06-17 · Bridgemill - Spohner · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ronel Willemse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
Laura White
2026-05-28 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claudia Spohner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 3-6
L
Tiffany Simpson / Jennifer Hanson
2026-05-12 · Bridgemill - Spohner · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elaine Eternod
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-01-08 · Bridgemill (Nina Hutcherson)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cheryl Richard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 6-3
L
2025-12-11 · Bridgemill (Nina Hutcherson)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natalie Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2025-12-04 · Bridgemill (Nina Hutcherson)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natalie Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-11-20 · Bridgemill (Nina Hutcherson)* · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-11-13 · Bridgemill (Nina Hutcherson)* · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
87.8%
36W–5L · 65.3% of games
4.0
44.7%
17W–21L · 48% of games
7.5
0%
0W–5L · 42.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
26 matches
#1 Singles
21%
18 matches
#2 Singles
18%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova