← Search

Cecile Mills

Newton Center, MA
3.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
12 matches · 4W–8L · seasons 2019–2023

Captains: add Cecile Mills to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history12 matches
W
2023-06-27 · DED:Dedham:Deng/Yanoff · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqueline Francona
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2023-06-13 · DED:Dedham:Deng/Yanoff · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqueline Francona
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2023-05-23 · DED:Dedham:Deng/Yanoff · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Driscoll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2023-05-16 · DED:Dedham:Deng/Yanoff · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqueline Francona
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L
2021-06-03 · BWEL:BSC Wellesley Red:Egger/Andrieux · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Cascio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2021-05-27 · BWEL:BSC Wellesley Red:Egger/Andrieux · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Cascio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2021-05-13 · BWEL:BSC Wellesley Red:Egger/Andrieux · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with CLAUDIA WHITELEY
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2019-07-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Carp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2019-06-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Haynes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2019-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Mead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
Po Darcy / Alyssa Darcy
2019-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Mead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2019-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Mead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2021–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 42.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
42%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova