← Search

Amanda Repert

Fort Collins, CO
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
131 matches · 75W–56L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amanda Repert to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history131 matches
L
2026-07-14 · LVTA · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Trudy Samuelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-10 · FCCC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Madissen Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · LVTA · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrea Wallace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-30 · LVTA · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Trudy Samuelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-26 · FCCC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Suzanne Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-23 · LVTA · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrea Wallace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-19 · FCCC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Suzanne Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · with Whitney Schroeder championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-05-31 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Bryce Melcher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Bryce Melcher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Bryce Melcher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-19 · CSU GOLD · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Madissen Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
68.7%
46W–21L · 59.1% of games
4.5
38.1%
8W–13L · 47.4% of games
5.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 55.9% of games
8.5mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 52.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
47 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
43 matches
#1 Singles
19%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
11 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova