← Search

Becca Hales

Stone Mountain, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
71 matches · 43W–28L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Becca Hales to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history71 matches
L
2026-07-09 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kate Jay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donna Marceau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 6-1
L
2026-06-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kara Koons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 2-6
W
Tran Huynh / Michelle Nguyen
2026-06-23 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nina Hafitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-18 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
Laura Taylor
2026-06-11 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-05-31 · Dekalb TC (Joyce Evans)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Vosseller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-28 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-01-17 · Dekalb TC (Joyce Evans)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Cambre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-01-11 · Dekalb TC (Joyce Evans)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Felzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
Jill White / Julie Zakas
2026-01-08 · GAC (Jennifer Crisp)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Crisp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
66.7%
40W–20L · 57.2% of games
4.0
30%
3W–7L · 39.5% of games
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 35% of the time
#1 Singles
35%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
12 matches
#2 Singles
7%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer