← Search

Gina Nielsen

Pocatello, ID
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
133 matches · 50W–83L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Gina Nielsen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history133 matches
L
2026-04-18 · Six Seven · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shawn Oram mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-04-02 · Six Seven · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jonathan Cree mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-14 · Six Seven · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shawn Oram mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-03-13 · Six Seven · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shawn Higbee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-08-21 · Racket Rebels · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lyn McArthur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-08-19 · Racket Rebels · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Marshall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-08-05 · Racket Rebels · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Marshall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-31 · Racket Rebels · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Marshall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-29 · Racket Rebels · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Marshall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2025-07-25 · Middle Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nilsa Kohn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-6, 4-5
W
2025-07-10 · Middle Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Tapanila
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-24 · Middle Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Gwinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
50%
8W–8L · 52.6% of games
3.0
31.6%
18W–39L · 42.5% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 37.5% of games
6.0mixed
47.1%
16W–18L · 49.8% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
35 matches
#1 Singles
4%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova