← Search

James Avallone

Mount Pleasant, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
175 matches · 84W–91L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add James Avallone to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history175 matches
L
2026-03-26 · LCTA18/Fanning/MPR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gunnar Hetzel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-24 · LCTA40/Tunick/ParkWest · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Coyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-17 · LCTA40/Tunick/ParkWest · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Fischer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-03-12 · LCTA18/Fanning/MPR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Oehlschlager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-03-07 · LCTA55/Lee/MPR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ansel Kay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-03 · LCTA40/Tunick/ParkWest · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Bonavito
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-02-26 · LCTA40/Tunick/ParkWest · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Evan Bundis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-02-25 · LCTA18/Fanning/MPR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Bonavito
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-17 · LCTA40/Tunick/ParkWest · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Zimmerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-13 · LCTA18/Fanning/MPR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charlie Inglefield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-02-10 · LCTA40/Tunick/ParkWest · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Bonavito
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Garrett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
76%
38W–12L · 58.6% of games
4.0
33.3%
23W–46L · 43.7% of games
7.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 52.6% of games
8.0
37.5%
6W–10L · 44.7% of games
7.0mixed
30.8%
4W–9L · 45.9% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 30% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
50 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
9 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams