← Search

Jeff Buhl

Arlington, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
110 matches · 49W–61L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Jeff Buhl to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history110 matches
W
2026-07-30 · Team 3 Pirates Over 40 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barry Dickman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-15 · Team 3 Pirates Over 40 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jordan Bentley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-2
L
2026-06-24 · Team 3 Pirates Over 40 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jordan Bentley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-20 · Team 8 Pirates Over 40 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Stevenson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-2
W
2026-06-07 · Team 8 Pirates Over 40 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jordan Bentley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
James Daniel Kohr II / Lowell Yoder
2026-05-28 · Rogers · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-19 · Rogers · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bryan Kay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-5
L
2026-05-13 · Rogers · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-5
W
2026-04-28 · Rogers · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-6
W
2026-03-29 · Rogers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Berray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-03-07 · Team 1 Spoilers · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Margaret Beetstra mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-5
L
2026-02-22 · Rogers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jose MacAranas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
71.1%
27W–11L · 57% of games
4.5
21.1%
4W–15L · 35.2% of games
8.0
52.4%
11W–10L · 49.1% of games
9.0
25%
1W–3L · 31.3% of games
7.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 50.3% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 18.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
26 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer