← Search

Stacey Jarrell

— year-end
112 matches · 72W–40L · seasons 2019–2024

Captains: add Stacey Jarrell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history112 matches
W
2024-02-18 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Simons mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2024-02-10 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Dyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
Linda Scott / Toni Hamlett
2024-02-03 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Naomi Thorpe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
L
2024-01-28 · #2 Doubles · with Anette Rego championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2024-01-26 · #1 Doubles · with Heidi Pernia championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2024-01-21 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Simons mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2024-01-06 · Double Trouble · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anette Rego
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L
Trevor Saunders / Jennifer Kraut
2023-09-22 · #3 Doubles · with Barbara McCarthy championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2023-08-18 · #2 Doubles · with Julia Miller championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
Wanda Pamphile / Christine Fitzpatrick
2023-07-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jean Boyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2023-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jean Boyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-2, 1-0
W
2023-06-17 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Teams5 teams · 2020–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 58.7% of games
4.0
93.3%
14W–1L · 65.4% of games
4.5
50%
7W–7L · 53.5% of games
8.0
87.9%
29W–4L · 66.3% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 45.6% of games
8.0mixed
51.5%
17W–16L · 53.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
19 matches
#1 Singles
8%
9 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova