← Search

Natalia Bonzon

— year-end
126 matches · 54W–72L · seasons 2020–2027

Captains: add Natalia Bonzon to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history126 matches
W
2026-09-11 · Schoolyard Tennis at Riviera Prep · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel Perez Giraldo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-09-09 · Alvarez (Riviera Country Club) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carlyle Starr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-22 · Schoolyard Tennis at Riviera Prep · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-08 · Smith (Riviera Country Club) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Schaul
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-25 · Alvarez (Riviera Country Club) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Blaire Molina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-15 · Alvarez (Riviera Country Club) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-04-14 · #2 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-13 · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-01 · Alvarez (Riviera Country Club) · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maite Martinez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-03-18 · Alvarez (Riviera Country Club) · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Blaire Molina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-03-11 · Alvarez (Riviera Country Club) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Schaul
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-06 · Smith (Riviera Country Club) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
Teams44 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
52%
39W–36L · 51.2% of games
4.0
31.4%
11W–24L · 45% of games
4.5
0%
0W–4L · 18.6% of games
6.5
20%
1W–4L · 39.2% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 23% of the time
#3 Doubles
23%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
17 matches
#2 Female Doubles
13%
16 matches
#1 Female Doubles
11%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal