← Search

Jaden Sims

Pelham, AL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
26 matches · 21W–5L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Jaden Sims to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history26 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Hoover Met - Hrynkiw/Benson · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-08-25 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Terry Sims
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-08-24 · Hoover Met - Glass · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Giani Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-19 · Hoover Met - Glass · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Zachary Winningham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-13 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tray Ivey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-21 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Terry Sims
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-05-11 · BH - Ingram · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Spencer Benson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-10 · Lifetime - Haladwala/Hrynkiw · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-03-02 · BH - Haladwala · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Spencer Benson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-11-17 · Hoover Met - Haladwala · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Spencer Benson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-11-05 · Hoover Met - Haladwala · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ryan Gaither
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-10-29 · Hoover Met - Swaminathan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sid Swaminathan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
81.2%
13W–3L · 64.7% of games
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
100%
5W–0L · 60% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
4 matches
#1 Singles
4%
1 match
#2 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe