← Search

Travis Turley

— year-end
36 matches · 30W–6L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Travis Turley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history36 matches
W
Rebecca Jones / David Carrasco
2026-07-14 · Clarke/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Miller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
L
Barbara Miller / Alan Stremsterfer
2026-07-10 · Gosselin55/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Caveney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
John Bui / Lindsey Stimets
2026-07-07 · Clarke/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tara Hurley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
Kris Gompert / Chris Curtis
2026-06-27 · Gosselin55/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Caveney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · Tanaru/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jerry Witherspoon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-03 · Gosselin/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Messing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-19 · Gosselin/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Pearson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-04-18 · Tanaru/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jerry Witherspoon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-11 · Tanaru/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Sullivan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-03-28 · Tanaru/Knoxville · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-15 · Gosselin/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2025-09-22 · Tanaru/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Robert Scheffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Teams35 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
82.4%
14W–3L · 60.1% of games
4.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 59.1% of games
4.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 57.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
10 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams