← Search

Jessica Johnson

Bend, OR
3.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
21 matches · 7W–14L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jessica Johnson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history21 matches
W
2026-08-01 · SOR-BGC-Roeder · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Sandgren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-31 · SOR-BGC-Roeder · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Sandgren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-31 · SOR-BGC-Roeder · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carol Roeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-05-31 · BGC-Bennett · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-05-09 · BGC-Bennett · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-18 · BGC-Bennett · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2020-09-16 · GJTC HPOUDRIER · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Seth Ritchey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
Brenden O'Brien / Shauna O'Brien
2019-08-18 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lee Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L
Brenden O'Brien / Shauna O'Brien
2019-07-28 · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lee Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
Brandon Dingae / Christina Sjolin
2019-07-21 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lee Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
Meghan Ciacci / Lisa Kutner
2019-06-05 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Ellen Putze
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
Brooke Bolinske / Elizabeth Sundberg
2019-06-01 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jennifer Rettig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 51.3% of games
3.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.9% of games
5.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 37.3% of games
7.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
7 matches
#1 Singles
14%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
3 matches
#2 Singles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer