← Search

Carolyn Roach

Wake Forest, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
63 matches · 28W–35L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Carolyn Roach to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history63 matches
L
2026-08-31 · Na.Norris18C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ashley Lindeman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-28 · Ve.Glass40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kesah DeLisio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-19 · Jo.Zorzi40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jade Paunovich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-08-11 · Am.Bauer18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jacqueline Engle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-07-31 · Ve.Glass40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julee Knight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-21 · Ve.Glass18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Jo Nugent
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-14 · Ve.Glass18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julee Knight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-07 · Ve.Glass18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cybele Brockmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-07-05 · Em.Kendall40S · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-09 · Ve.Glass18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Veronica Glass
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-26 · Ve.Glass18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Samantha Starr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-24 · Em.Kendall40S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
46.7%
7W–8L · 50.5% of games
4.0
48.5%
16W–17L · 47.3% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
40%
4W–6L · 46.9% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
11 matches
#1 Singles
13%
8 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches
#3 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert