← Search

Michelle Grocke

— year-end
21 matches · 11W–10L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Michelle Grocke to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history21 matches
W
2025-11-14 · #3 Doubles · with Natalie Van Dusen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-11-14 · #3 Doubles · with Kayti Lausch championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
Diane Boat / Katie Bailey
2025-11-14 · #3 Doubles · with Susie Boyer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
Wendy Brady / Margot Bloom
2025-10-18 · #3 Doubles · with Danielle Smith championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-10-18 · #3 Doubles · with Danielle Smith championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
Christina Peterman / Tina Taylor
2025-09-05 · #3 Doubles · with Amy Gallik championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-08-10 · MT/LARSON/TRILEVEL/W3.5/4.0/4.5 · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Natalie Van Dusen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-08-08 · MT/LARSON/TRILEVEL/W3.5/4.0/4.5 · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Susie Boyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2025-07-27 · Montana/Erickson/40 & Over-4.0W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kandy Chain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2025-07-27 · Montana/Erickson/40 & Over-4.0W · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danielle Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2024-08-03 · Yours · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-08-02 · Yours · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Teams6 teams · 2022–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 48.9% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 71% of the time
#3 Doubles
71%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
2 matches
#1 Singles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer