← Search

Jill Wolborsky

Raleigh, NC
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
142 matches · 41W–101L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jill Wolborsky to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history142 matches
W
Taylor Coburn / Meredith Sunstrom
2026-08-31 · La.Bradley18C · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Blair Jernigan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-17 · La.Bradley18C · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sarah Ammirati
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-07-13 · Je.Wolborsky18T · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kimberly Love
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-22 · Je.Wolborsky18T · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Emily Andino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-22 · Je.Wolborsky18T · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Eliza Bobryshev
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-10-17 · He.McCann40S · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-07 · Ki.Lamb40C · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Heidi McCann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
Holly Gyovai / Patricia Smith
2025-09-23 · Ki.Lamb40C · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Heidi McCann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2025-08-24 · Ki.Lamb40C · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jeannette Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
Stephanie Gillespie / Jeanna Hastie
2025-08-18 · Ki.Lamb40C · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Tina Goertz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2025-07-07 · Je.Wolborsky18T · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Emily Andino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-07-05 · Je.Wolborsky40S3.0 · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
35.1%
20W–37L · 43.9% of games
3.0
14.3%
8W–48L · 30.3% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 62.4% of games
5.5
38.1%
8W–13L · 42.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
47 matches
#3 Singles
19%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
24 matches
#1 Singles
16%
22 matches
#2 Singles
9%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
7%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova