← Search

Joey Hass

— year-end
155 matches · 67W–88L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Joey Hass to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history155 matches
W
2026-09-13 · GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Cartwright/EPCC#2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beka Levy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-26 · GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Cartwright/EPCC#2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beka Levy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-04 · GEPTA/40&overMX/3.5/Cartwright/EPCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Greg DiDonna mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-28 · GEPTA/40&overMX/3.5/Cartwright/EPCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Leslie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-21 · GEPTA/40&overMX/3.5/Cartwright/EPCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bill Ruddock mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-07-07 · GEPTA/40&overMX/3.5/Cartwright/EPCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Leslie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-16 · GEPTA/40&overMX/3.5/Cartwright/EPCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terry Calhoun mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-19 · A40 3.5W BR Altman · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Ruwadi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-12 · A40 3.5W BR Altman · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Francie Morrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-01 · X40 7.0 BR Timken · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Drew Swallen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-26 · A18 3.5W BR Timken · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Timken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-04-24 · Entry Tri W BR Timken · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Francie Morrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
Teams40 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
70.6%
12W–5L · 61.9% of games
3.5
39.6%
40W–61L · 46.3% of games
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 29.2% of games
6.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 42.1% of games
3.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 41.1% of games
7.0mixed
64.7%
11W–6L · 51.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 23% of the time
#1 Singles
23%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
36 matches
#2 Singles
18%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
27 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams