← Search

Becky Vlasek

Missouri City, TX
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
35 matches · 17W–18L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Becky Vlasek to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history35 matches
L
2025-10-14 · Sugar Creek · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shin Dih Bayeh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
Karen Scott / Shawn Hanscom
2025-09-16 · Sugar Creek · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-29 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joy Rosner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-25 · Sugar Creek CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2025-03-04 · Sugar Creek CC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joy Rosner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-02-25 · Sugar Creek CC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kiley Lubojasky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-02-11 · Sugar Creek CC · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kiley Lubojasky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-02-01 · Sugar Creek CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brenda Crocker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2024-10-29 · Sugar Creek CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leslie Nagy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-10-22 · Sugar Creek CC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Giang Dinh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2024-10-08 · Sugar Creek CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joy Rosner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2024-10-01 · Sugar Creek CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joy Rosner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
51.7%
15W–14L · 50.3% of games
4.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 38.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
6 matches
#1 Singles
9%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams