← Search

Igor Gogov

Chicago, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
277 matches · 193W–84L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Igor Gogov to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history277 matches
L
2026-08-16 · NITA S 85CMb River Trails-Ciuca · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Oscar Moncau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-13 · NITA S 85CMb River Trails-Ciuca · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Oscar Moncau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-11 · CDTA S TriMHi 1.RT Ciuca Sat 2 $27 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adrian Ciuca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
Ryan Zheng
2026-08-08 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
Kartheepan Sivaguru
2026-08-01 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-01 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-18 · CDTA S TriMHi 1.RT Ciuca Sat 2 $27 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sammy Hong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
N/A
2026-07-11 · CDTA S 18&OM4.0 4.RT Ciuca Fri 7 $27 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Witt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-09 · CDTA S 18&OM4.0 4.RT Ciuca Fri 7 $27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Simon Abraham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-06-28 · NITA S TLM45b River Trails-Ciuca · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hazem Isawi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-27 · CDTA S 18&OM4.0 4.RT Ciuca Fri 7 $27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Justin Booms
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
85%
34W–6L · 65.9% of games
4.0
72%
59W–23L · 56.5% of games
7.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 51.3% of games
8.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 55.4% of games
7.0mixed
96.4%
27W–1L · 66.9% of games
7.5mixed
60%
15W–10L · 57.3% of games
8.0mixed
65.7%
23W–12L · 55.2% of games
8.5mixed
60%
6W–4L · 55.7% of games
9.0mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 51.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
80 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
76 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
47 matches
#2 Singles
14%
40 matches
#1 Singles
12%
34 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King