← Search

Timmie DAgostino

— year-end
162 matches · 76W–86L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Timmie DAgostino to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history162 matches
L
2026-09-10 · Mejia · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emily Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-31 · Boggs · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stanley Brewer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-08-31 · Mejia · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Renee Ross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-27 · Mejia · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Renee Ross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
Randy Robbins / Holly Carter
2026-08-26 · Boggs · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stanley Brewer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-19 · Boggs · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stanley Brewer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-17 · Mejia · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Renee Ross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-12 · Boggs · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stanley Brewer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-05 · Boggs · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stanley Brewer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-19 · Copeland/Carter · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Noelle Flores
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
Calli Salazar / Leslie Morgan
2026-05-12 · Copeland/Carter · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Noelle Flores
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-04-29 · Copeland/Carter · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Teams54 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
58.8%
57W–40L · 55.2% of games
4.0
10.5%
2W–17L · 36.7% of games
6.5
0%
0W–4L · 39.3% of games
7.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 61.5% of games
7.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 40.4% of games
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
35.7%
5W–9L · 45.2% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 18.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
45 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
44 matches
#1 Singles
7%
12 matches
#2 Singles
6%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova