← Search

Nancy Langlais

— year-end
197 matches · 118W–79L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nancy Langlais to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history197 matches
W
2026-07-07 · RFL:Spark & Smash:Levine/Horrigan · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laurie Swanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-22 · RFL:Spark & Smash:Levine/Horrigan · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with JoAnne Mahonski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-20 · RFL:Spark & Smash:Levine/Horrigan · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katarzyna Saar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-16 · RFL:Spark & Smash:Levine/Horrigan · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristina Schumann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-08 · (Q) BSF:Ad Court:Abreu · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Louisa Hogan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-03 · (Q) BSF:Ad Court:Abreu · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Troiani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
Daniel Polhamus / Suzanne Neville
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · with Liem Nguyen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-05-12 · BSF:Sweet Shots:Harris/Langlais · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marie McQueeney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-05 · BSF:Sweet Shots:Harris/Langlais · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with JoAnne Mahonski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-21 · BSF:Sweet Shots:Harris/Langlais · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tenley Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-17 · BSF:Match Makers 18:Abreu/Nguyen · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ted Krawiec mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-04-12 · BSF:Match Makers 18:Abreu/Nguyen · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frederic de Baeck mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-7
Teams30 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
60.2%
100W–66L · 55% of games
3.5
0%
0W–5L · 33.7% of games
6.0
76.5%
13W–4L · 57.7% of games
7.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 50.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 63% of the time
#1 Doubles
63%
124 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
17 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert