← Search

Craig Mucci

Columbia, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
325 matches · 197W–128L · seasons 2016–2026

Captains: add Craig Mucci to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history325 matches
W
2026-06-17 · CTL18/CLARK/CTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Clark mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-14 · CTL40/CLARK/CTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Clark mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-09 · CTL40/CLARK/CTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janie Mucci mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-06-05 · CTL18/CLARK/CTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Klinepeter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-06 · CTL18/CLARK/CTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janie Mucci mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-05 · CTL40/CLARK/CTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Augusta Rembert mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-23 · LATA40/Henderson/LCTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Larry Ellisor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-16 · CTL18/Faust/CTFC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alex Wilcox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-04-03 · LATA40/Henderson/LCTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Larry Ellisor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
Cole Taylor / Matthew Isenhower
2026-03-19 · LATA40/Henderson/LCTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Larry Ellisor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-12 · LATA40/Henderson/LCTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Larry Ellisor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-03-05 · LATA40/Henderson/LCTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Larry Ellisor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
69.1%
114W–51L · 57.2% of games
4.0
60%
3W–2L · 51.2% of games
6.5
74.2%
23W–8L · 58.3% of games
7.5
54.5%
18W–15L · 50.6% of games
3.5mixed
42.9%
12W–16L · 45% of games
7.0mixed
35.3%
12W–22L · 43% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
115 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
101 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
95 matches
#1 Singles
3%
10 matches
#2 Singles
1%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams