← Search

Jose Alomar

— year-end
119 matches · 77W–42L · seasons 2020–2027

Captains: add Jose Alomar to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history119 matches
W
2026-09-12 · Arbor Greene Bourbon Boys/Williams · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jay Kandell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-06-06 · Arbor Green BourbonBoys/ P. Williams · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Arfsten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · Arbor Green BourbonBoys/ P. Williams · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Arfsten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · Arbor Green BourbonBoys/ P. Williams · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sylvain Gauthier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
Franco de Andreis / Ernesto Perez
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · with William Arfsten championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-04-26 · #2 Doubles · with William Arfsten championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · with William Arfsten championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · with Sylvain Gauthier championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-11 · Arbor Green BourbonBoys/ P. Williams · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Arfsten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-03-21 · PInellas/Buckner · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Arfsten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-14 · PInellas/Buckner · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Arfsten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-28 · PInellas/Buckner · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Smiechewicz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Teams46 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
71%
44W–18L · 57.2% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
80%
4W–1L · 68.2% of games
8.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 52.3% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 37.7% of games
8.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 50.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
55 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
26 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams