← Search

Jane Wang

New York, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
168 matches · 88W–80L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jane Wang to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history168 matches
W
2026-05-14 · Gould/Rey · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Le Yang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-05 · Gould/Rey · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-09 · Metro: Mink · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-6
L
2026-04-01 · Lee/Bruzat · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Pina mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-29 · Bernstein · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meiko Boynton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-03-19 · Bindler · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Leonardo King mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-15 · Bernstein · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meiko Boynton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-03-14 · Lee/Bruzat · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Pina mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-03-01 · Lee/Bruzat · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tyler Beauchesne mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-26 · Bindler · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Leonardo King mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-02-25 · Metro: Mink · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ling Zhang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-3
W
2026-02-24 · Bernstein · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meiko Boynton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
50%
2W–2L · 53.5% of games
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
66.7%
22W–11L · 59.6% of games
4.0
37%
17W–29L · 42% of games
7.0mixed
68.8%
22W–10L · 56.4% of games
8.0mixed
49%
25W–26L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
35 matches
#1 Singles
16%
26 matches
#2 Singles
12%
20 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer