← Search

Tori Schwartz

— year-end
38 matches · 25W–13L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tori Schwartz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history38 matches
L
Maci Doden / Jane Smith
2026-07-20 · NIN SB 18&O 4.5 W: Wysong · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with LeighAnne Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-07 · NIN FW 18&O 4.0 W: WW Fabina · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Fabina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-30 · NIN FW 18&O 4.0 W: WW Fabina · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathryn Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-06-03 · NIN SB 18&O 4.5 W: Wysong · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Taelor Grose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-02 · NIN FW 18&O 4.0 W: WW Fabina · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-05-26 · NIN FW 18&O 4.0 W: WW Fabina · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-15 · NIN FW MXD 18&O 9.0: Eggleston · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Joshua Rifkin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Derek Stoney / Linying Xiao
2026-05-02 · NIN FW MXD 18&O 9.0: Eggleston · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Andres Cobos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-04-27 · NIN FW 18&O 3.5,4.0.4.5 W: Grabill/Huck · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-13 · NIN FW 18&O 3.5,4.0.4.5 W: Grabill/Huck · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Grabill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-06 · NIN FW 18&O 3.5,4.0.4.5 W: Grabill/Huck · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Fabina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-23 · NIN FW 18&O 3.5,4.0.4.5 W: Grabill/Huck · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
Teams6 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 37.5% of games
4.0
100%
15W–0L · 66.4% of games
4.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 39.2% of games
8.5
100%
5W–0L · 57.3% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
7 matches
#1 Singles
11%
4 matches
#2 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova