← Search

Kenneth Schwartz

— year-end
46 matches · 16W–30L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Kenneth Schwartz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Laurel Oak Rosenberg · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dustin Keith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-01 · Laurel Oak Rosenberg · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Rosenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-18 · Laurel Oak Rosenberg · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Greg Logan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-04 · Laurel Oak Rosenberg · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joe Malave
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-28 · Laurel Oak Rosenberg · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bradley Sutter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-21 · Laurel Oak Rosenberg · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mike Beasley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-03-25 · Laurel Oak 55 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bradley Sutter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
Kyle Kappes / Jon Neville
2026-03-19 · Laurel Oak 55 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bradley Sutter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-02-19 · Laurel Oak 55 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Weiss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-12 · Laurel Oak 55 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Brielmaier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-09 · Laurel Oak 55 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bradley Sutter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-02-02 · Laurel Oak 55 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bradley Sutter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
Teams29 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 50.8% of games
4.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 39.5% of games
7.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 51.6% of games
7.5
28.6%
4W–10L · 41.1% of games
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 46.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer