Jocelyn Sturgeon
University Heights, OH
114 matches · 78W–36L · seasons 2019–2024
Captains: add Jocelyn Sturgeon to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history114 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2024
A18 3.0W MV2 Hunter
A18 3.5W MV4 Zhang
OH NEO A18 3.0W Brady
OH NEO A40 3.0W Hunter
A18 3.0W MV3 Ung
A18 3.5W MV3 Zhang
A40 3.0W MV2 Hunter
C 6.5W MV1 Kirchick
A18 3.0W MV4 Ung
A40 3.0W MV2 Hunter
C 6.5W MV2 Kirchick
C 6.5W MV2 Smith
MI 7.0 MV Gustafson
MI 7.0 MV Gustafson
X40 7.0 NR Rapp
X40 7.0 NR2 Rapp
A18 3.0W MV Ung
A18 3.5W MV1 Kirchick
A40 3.0W MV Hunter
C 6.5W MV Kirchick
Women
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
77.8%
42W–12L · 59.9% of games
3.5
40%
8W–12L · 45.3% of games
5.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
68.4%
13W–6L · 54.3% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 55.1% of games
7.0mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 56.2% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
35 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
4 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.