← Search

Linda Heinrichs

— year-end
45 matches · 17W–28L · seasons 2020–2027

Captains: add Linda Heinrichs to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
L
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alicia Farley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-06-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marsha Leban
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-01-15 · Terrell Mill (Linda Heinrichs)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Seeley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-12-04 · Terrell Mill (Linda Heinrichs)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rosemary Candler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2025-11-20 · Terrell Mill (Linda Heinrichs)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Aston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-06 · Terrell Mill (Linda Heinrichs)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Aston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-01-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melanie Erwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-6
W
2024-01-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melanie Erwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 7-5
L
2023-12-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaux Boyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2023-12-12 · Indian Hills CC (Maureen Griffin)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaux Boyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2023-12-05 · Indian Hills CC (Maureen Griffin)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marsha Leban
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2023-11-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kortney Clayton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Teams2 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
55.6%
10W–8L · 55.3% of games
3.5
28%
7W–18L · 43.2% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
8 matches
#1 Singles
16%
7 matches
#2 Singles
9%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
4%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal