← Search

Ayumi Sasaki

DETROIT, MI
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
96 matches · 71W–25L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Ayumi Sasaki to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history96 matches
W
2026-08-24 · EAST-Kean 9.5 COMBO MIX · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with Matthew Prigorac mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-16 · #2 Doubles · with Sienna Osborne championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Sienna Osborne championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
Shelby Hullett / Abbey Neff
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Sienna Osborne championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-05 · EAST-Kean 9.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Julian Olejnik mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-28 · #2 Doubles · 10.0 · with Matthew Prigorac mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-07-09 · EAST-Monte 18s 5.0 NW · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Montana Crawford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
Elsie van Wieren / Jake Stants
2026-07-07 · #3 Doubles · 10.0 · with Peter Wagner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-19 · EAST-Kean 18s 9.0X F · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Michael Haines mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-11 · EAST-Monte 18s 5.0 NW · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Yahsha Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-04 · EAST-Monte 18s 5.0 NW · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Sienna Osborne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-28 · EAST-Monte 18s 5.0 NW · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Sienna Osborne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
5.0
74.2%
23W–8L · 58.7% of games
8.5
75%
3W–1L · 65.7% of games
9.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
10.0mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 52.4% of games
9.0mixed
80%
12W–3L · 61.3% of games
9.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
17 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams