← Search

David Ponraj

Dunedin, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
254 matches · 174W–80L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add David Ponraj to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history254 matches
W
2026-09-12 · HCC Thunder & Lightning/Halm · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alex Morales
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-08-26 · HCC Thunder & Lightning/Halm · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nicholas Rothstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-25 · HCC Thunder & Lightning/Halm · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Doug Clery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-22 · HCC Thunder & Lightning/Halm · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kevin Brick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-17 · HCC Thunder & Lightning/Halm · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kevin Brick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-10 · #3 Doubles · with Max Collazo championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-10 · #1 Doubles · with Max Collazo championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
Christian Berbin / Carlos Mendoza
2026-08-09 · #2 Doubles · with Max Collazo championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Max Collazo championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Max Collazo championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · with Max Collazo championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · with Max Collazo championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
75.3%
67W–22L · 60.3% of games
4.0
53.3%
8W–7L · 49% of games
7.5
83.3%
35W–7L · 60.3% of games
7.0mixed
85.2%
23W–4L · 60.4% of games
8.0mixed
63.6%
14W–8L · 56.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
94 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
57 matches
#1 Singles
12%
31 matches
#2 Singles
2%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe