← Search

Catherine McCann

Indianapolis, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
268 matches · 156W–112L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Catherine McCann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history268 matches
L
2026-09-10 · Low Tri W IRCD Akers · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cynthia Heinbaugh
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
Shelby Ackerman / Sarah Lynch
2026-09-03 · Low Tri W IRCD Akers · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diane Turpen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-23 · Low Tri W IRCD Akers · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Davis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-22 · Indy X18 7.0X LNHS Bartelt · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Adin McCann mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-31 · Indy X18 7.0X LNHS Bartelt · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Adin McCann mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
L
Lisa Martin
2026-07-09 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Strobel · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-25 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Strobel · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carole Clohessy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
James Stewart / Ute Coyne
2026-06-19 · Indy X18 7.0X LNHS Bartelt · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Adin McCann mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-18 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Strobel · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Lacy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-06 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Strobel · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Dalton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-04 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Strobel · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-14 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Strobel · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
50%
3W–3L · 49.5% of games
3.5
79.1%
68W–18L · 63% of games
4.0
37.3%
19W–32L · 46.1% of games
6.5
50%
3W–3L · 51% of games
7.5
45.8%
11W–13L · 49.2% of games
6.5mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 62.2% of games
7.0mixed
50.7%
35W–34L · 50.7% of games
7.5mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 46.4% of games
8.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 42% of the time
#1 Singles
42%
112 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
54 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
39 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe