← Search

David Smith

Tacoma, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
76 matches · 29W–47L · seasons 2021–2027

Captains: add David Smith to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history76 matches
L
2026-09-13 · TLTC-Smith/Nemetz · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chris Langdon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-08 · Smith Englund · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nathan Englund
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
N/A
2026-08-07 · Smith Doherty · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Doherty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-07 · Smith Doherty · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Doherty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-06-27 · Smith Doherty · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Doherty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-22 · Smith Doherty · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Nemetz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-14 · Smith Englund · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Piper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-13 · TLTC-Nemetz · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Doherty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-09 · Smith Englund · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nathan Englund
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-07 · Smith Englund · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Piper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-06 · Smith Doherty · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Doherty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · TLTC-Nemetz · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Doherty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
35.7%
10W–18L · 44.2% of games
3.5
55.6%
10W–8L · 45% of games
6.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 44.1% of games
7.0
26.3%
5W–14L · 41.6% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
16 matches
#1 Singles
12%
9 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams