← Search

Kim Himstreet

Bend, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
144 matches · 75W–69L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kim Himstreet to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history144 matches
W
2026-08-02 · #1 Doubles · with Lisa Johannessen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-01 · ACB-Tightly Strung · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Silfven
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-31 · ACB-Tightly Strung · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Johannessen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-26 · #3 Doubles · with Kevin Semonsen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-07-25 · ACB-Mixed Nuts · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kevin Semonsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-24 · ACB-Mixed Nuts · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kevin Semonsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-07 · ACB-Johannessen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Johannessen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-06 · ACB-Johannessen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Johannessen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-02 · ACB-Tightly Strung · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lucinda Fournier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-05-02 · ACB-Tightly Strung · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lucinda Fournier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-01 · ACB-Tightly Strung · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lucinda Fournier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-12 · ACB-Johannessen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lucinda Fournier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
54%
34W–29L · 55.8% of games
4.0
30%
3W–7L · 47.7% of games
7.0
60%
3W–2L · 58% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
65.2%
15W–8L · 55.8% of games
8.0mixed
36%
9W–16L · 48.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 62% of the time
#1 Doubles
62%
89 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
22 matches
#1 Singles
4%
5 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal