← Search

Nancy Hennessy

— year-end
37 matches · 20W–17L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Nancy Hennessy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history37 matches
W
2026-08-25 · Southside - Billion · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jill Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-20 · San Jose - Hennessy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karla Liguori
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
Kim Gillette / Morgan Storm
2026-08-13 · San Jose - Hennessy · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Karin Selfors
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-04 · Southside - Billion · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Heather Riley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-07 · Southside - Billion · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jill Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · San Jose - Winslow · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Blocker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-05-23 · San Jose - Winslow · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · San Jose - Winslow · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Siebenhaar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-03-22 · San Jose - Hennessy · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dawn Siebenhaar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-03-04 · San Jose - Wise · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-02-22 · San Jose - Wise · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karin Selfors
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-02-20 · San Jose - Hedrick · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris Oliver mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
Teams49 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 54.9% of games
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
60%
6W–4L · 58.9% of games
4.0
40%
4W–6L · 44.4% of games
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 51.9% of games
7.0
100%
4W–0L · 62.9% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
7 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe