← Search

Mark Charney

— year-end
18 matches · 9W–9L · seasons 2019–2023

Captains: add Mark Charney to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history18 matches
L
David Black / Louis Geremia
2023-06-12 · WAC:Waltham:Park/Hardy · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Thullen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2023-05-08 · WAC:Waltham:Park/Hardy · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Harish Mehta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2019-12-22 · BLEX:BSC Lexington:Ow · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rob Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2019-11-10 · BLEX:BSC Lexington:Ow · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rob Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2019-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vatee Pattaropong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
Carl van Zweden / Mark Webb
2019-07-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rob Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
Goetz Hagen / Peter Rooks
2019-07-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amit Nene
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
James Cassidy / Kevin Kraft
2019-06-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Nardone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2019-06-10 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Iverson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
Tim Mayer / Fred Wang
2019-06-05 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Hayes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2019-05-20 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Hayes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2019-05-13 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gregory Klein-Hertzel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Teams3 teams · 2020–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
50%
6W–6L · 46.3% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams