← Search

Helen Wood

Charlotte, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
54 matches · 22W–32L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Helen Wood to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history54 matches
W
2026-09-11 · NPratt (Blakeney) · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Laurey Cosentino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-31 · CBolzani (Blakeney) · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Laurey Cosentino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-21 · NPratt (Blakeney) · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Payal K
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-06 · NPratt (Blakeney) · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Seema Gahlawat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-10 · NPratt (Blakeney) · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Celia Bolzani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-29 · NPratt (Blakeney) · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Celia Bolzani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
Laura Hunter / Giuliana Bolanos
2026-06-26 · NPratt (Blakeney) · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Catherine Wigington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-05 · NPratt (Blakeney) · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Gunner Roza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-24 · NPratt (Blakeney) · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-4
L
2026-03-09 · NPratt (Blakeney) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-06 · MDevendorf (Blakeney) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Drees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-02 · NPratt (Blakeney) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
0%
0W–5L · 31% of games
3.0
58.3%
14W–10L · 49.9% of games
3.5
20%
2W–8L · 37.6% of games
5.5
50%
2W–2L · 52.4% of games
6.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 45% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
14 matches
#1 Singles
6%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova