← Search

Andrew Schulz

Matthews, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
38 matches · 15W–23L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Andrew Schulz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history38 matches
L
2026-09-09 · BAdcock/ASchulz (Pine Lake) · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with Brett Landau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-03 · JClarke/Dukes (Park Road) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hien Jimmy Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-22 · MWege (Pine Lake) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Dave Porter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-20 · JClarke/Dukes (Park Road) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Matthew Borcich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-18 · MWege (Pine Lake) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with David Batten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-08-12 · BAdcock/ASchulz (Pine Lake) · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Marcus Wege
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
Adrian Mendoza
2026-07-18 · GDumit/ASchulz (Alexander Stree Park) · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-2
W
2026-06-25 · BAdcock (Pine Lake) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcus Wege
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-15 · GDumit/ASchulz (Alexander Stree Park) · #3 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-09 · GDumit/ASchulz (Alexander Stree Park) · #3 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-07 · JDukes/MWege (Pine Lake) · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-30 · JDukes/MWege (Pine Lake) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Peter Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
50%
11W–11L · 50.1% of games
8.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 36% of games
9.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 38.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
7 matches
#1 Singles
16%
6 matches
#3 Singles
8%
3 matches
#2 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer