← Search

Janet Tran

Missouri City, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
93 matches · 53W–40L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Janet Tran to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history93 matches
L
Noriko Abe / Ronnie Kwan
2026-08-30 · LLTC - Fun Bunch · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Wang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-08-28 · LLTC - Fun Bunch · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Wang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-24 · LLTC - Fun Bunch · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Wang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-05-20 · Missouri City - Game, Set, Match-A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Hechler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-06 · Missouri City - Game, Set, Match-A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Kim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-28 · Houston Christian - Net Assets · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-14 · Houston Christian - Net Assets · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diem Pham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-03-19 · Missouri City · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diem Pham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-16 · Houston Christian · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diem Pham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-05 · Missouri City · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frankie Erickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-02-26 · Missouri City · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diem Pham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-02-23 · Houston Christian · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diem Pham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5
64.9%
24W–13L · 56% of games
4.0
38.5%
5W–8L · 47.8% of games
7.0
46.2%
6W–7L · 53.2% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
68%
17W–8L · 56.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
28 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe